Biovail Comments On Proposed Generic Wellbutrin XL(R) Trial

(NYSE/TSX: ) today commented on a proposed clinical trial recently announced by Ltd. According to Teva, the trial is intended to address reports of inefficacy and by consumers who switched from ® 300 mg, Biovail’s FDA-approved brand of the antidepressant, bupropion hydrochloride, to , Teva’s generic formulation of the drug. The trial was described in a dated December 2, 2009.

Based on the limited information that has been made available about the clinical trial by Teva, Biovail believes the proposed study will not likely effectively address the complaints of consumers because it is too small in size and too brief in duration.

According to the December 2, 2009 article, the proposed study will enroll 138 patients who complained after switching from ® 300 mg to . The study purportedly will employ a “double dummy” design in which patients will receive both placebo and active doses of each product over 16 days, alternating after eight days. Patients will be confined in a clinical setting for a total period of 24 days.

A statement in the article attributed to Teva’s head of suggests that the study will rely on blood-level data to verify of ® and . The article indicates that will be based on the standard of the U.S. (FDA). are also to be recorded.

is already deemed to be bioequivalent to ® by the FDA as defined by existing standard FDA criteria. Biovail believes this determination is likely to be confirmed by the proposed new trial.

However, based on available information, an retained by Biovail to consider the matter noted, “Even if ® and were found (again) to be bioequivalent according to FDA criteria, the failure to find systematic differences in AUC and Cmax in the study does not exclude the possibility of other between-product differences affecting clinical response.”

Biovail believes the size of the proposed Teva study, while much larger than needed for testing, is likely too small to demonstrate that ® 300 mg and have similar safety, tolerability, and/or efficacy profiles. In addition, the eight-day treatment periods in the proposed trial may be too brief for a clinically meaningful result, since most antidepressant clinical trials require treatment periods of at least 28 days.

To meaningfully address the reports of inefficacy and , Biovail’s expert believes that a more extensive re-randomized trial should be conducted. In such a study, a larger number of subjects, both those who have and have not reported difficulties upon being switched from ® 300 mg to in the past, would be assigned to ® and placebo under double-dummy conditions. During the study, groups of subjects would be re-randomized to and placebo ®, or continued on their original treatment.

Based on the views of its outside expert, Biovail believes a much larger and differently designed trial than has been proposed by Teva is required to demonstrate what, if any, clinical differences exist between ® 300 mg and .

Biovail’s primary concern is the safety and well-being of patients.

Source

  • Share/Bookmark